New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 11/18/2015
Delacruz v. Alfieri
Citations
- 447 N.J. Super. 1
- 145 A.3d 695
- 2015 N.J. Super. LEXIS 223
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the entire controversy doctrine applies to “germane” counterclaims that “could have been brought in [a] . . . foreclosure action”
- finding the entire controversy doctrine barred claims against a mortgage loan servicer following entry of a final judgment in the foreclosure action on the mortgage
- describing germane claims as those that “could have been brought in the foreclosure action”
- “An assignee of a right will be considered to be in privity with its assignor.” (quoting Brookshire Equities, LLC v. Montaquiza, 787 A.2d 942, 947 (App. Div. 2002))
- “Claims or defenses that went to the validity of the mortgage, the amount due, or the right of [mortgagee] to foreclose had to be raised in the foreclosure proceeding or they were barred.”
- “Claims or defenses that went to the validity of the mortgage, the amount due, or the right of [mortgagee] to foreclose had to be raised in the foreclosure proceeding or they were barred.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thurber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-10-24· cited 3,095×
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court· 1955-06-06· cited 1,049×
- Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1954-12-13· cited 808×
- DiTrolio v. AntilesSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-08-01· cited 245×
- Watkins v. Resorts International Hotel & Casino Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1991-06-11· cited 239×
- Carvalho v. Toll Bros. and DevelopersSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1996-05-06· cited 187×
- Bill J. Gambocz v. Anthony M. YelencsicsThird Circuit· 1972-10-12· cited 186×
- Crispin v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-06-13· cited 160×
- Olds v. DonnellySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1997-07-16· cited 160×
- Velasquez v. FranzSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1991-04-25· cited 155×
- City of Hackensack v. WinnerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1980-01-22· cited 153×
- Matter of Estate of DawsonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1994-07-15· cited 141×
- Great Falls Bank v. PardoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-01-27· cited 140×
- Kwabena Wadeer v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company (072010)Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2015-02-18· cited 125×
- Mystic Isle Development Corp. v. Perskie & NehmadSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-08-01· cited 124×
- Ajamian v. SchlangerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1954-02-15· cited 101×
- Brown v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1986-02-28· cited 84×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.