Court of Appeals of Arizona· 7/31/1984
DeGroot v. Arizona Racing Commission
Citations
- 686 P.2d 1301
- 141 Ariz. 331
- 1984 Ariz. App. LEXIS 608
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that generally, failure to raise an issue before an administrative tribunal precludes judicial review of that issue unless it is jurisdictional
- explaining that a reviewing court may not substitute its own judgment for the agency’s on matters committed to agency discretion
- finding waiver where one due process claim raised on appeal was not raised before the racing commission even though another due process claim had been presented
- \[F]ailure to raise an issue before an administrative tribunal precludes judicial review of that issue on appeal unless the issue is jurisdictional in nature.\
- failure to raise issue before administrative tribunal precludes judicial review of that issue unless issue is jurisdictional
- “If two inconsistent factual conclusions could be supported by the record, then there is substan tial evidence to support an administrative decision that elects either conclusion”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haire, Eubank, Meyerson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. Desert Valley Wood Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-12-20· cited 79×
- Comeau v. Arizona State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-05-13· cited 52×
- Eastern Vanguard Forex Ltd. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-10-30· cited 37×
- Gaveck v. Arizona State Board of Podiatry ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-09-01· cited 34×
- Ritland v. Arizona State Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-08-17· cited 25×
- Pavlik v. Chinle Unified School District No. 24Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-03-11· cited 24×
- Croft v. Arizona State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-05-03· cited 21×
- Schillerstrom v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-07-26· cited 21×
- Ethridge v. Arizona State Board of NursingCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-12-21· cited 20×
- In Re Disciplinary Action of McCuneUtah Supreme Court· 1986-03-31· cited 20×
- Sanders v. NovickCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-11-10· cited 19×
- Rouse v. Scottsdale Unified School District No. 48Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-11-27· cited 19×
- Smith v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-09-11· cited 18×
- Neal v. City of KingmanArizona Supreme Court· 1991-09-17· cited 16×
- Shaffer v. Arizona State Liquor BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-02-29· cited 16×
- JH2K I LLC v. Ariz. Dep't of Health Servs.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2019-03-12· cited 15×
- Wassef v. Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners ex rel. HuguninCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-03-28· cited 14×
- Clay v. Arizona Interscholastic Ass'nArizona Supreme Court· 1989-06-27· cited 13×
- Carley v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-02-26· cited 13×
- Claridge v. New Mexico State Racing CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1988-06-22· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.