Smith v. Arizona Department of Transportation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If two inconsistent factual conclusions could be supported by the record, then there is substantial evidence to support [a] ... decision that elects either conclusion.”
• probable cause does not require law enforcement “to show that the operator was in 8 fact under the influence”; “[o]nly the probability and not a prima facie showing of intoxication is the standard for probable cause”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).