Deaton v. Deaton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that strict documentation of time and expense is not required in a divorce case where the circuit court has had the opportunity to observe the parties, their level of cooperation, and their obedience to court orders.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tiner v. Tiner
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2012-09-12· cited 28×
• Gilliam v. Gilliam
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2010-02-11· cited 24×
• Davis v. Williamson
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2004-09-30· cited 23×
• Stout v. Stout
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2011-03-09· cited 10×
• Lashey Hopping (Formerly Almager) v. Timothy Scarborough, Jr.
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2026-05-13· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Day v. Day
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1984-01-30· cited 100×
• Sweeney v. Sweeney
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1980-01-28· cited 45×
• Knopf v. Knopf
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1979-01-29· cited 14×