Supreme Court of Georgia· 6/23/1981
Dean v. State
Citations
- 279 S.E.2d 217
- 247 Ga. 724
- 1981 Ga. LEXIS 840
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \trial judges should point out to the defendants that joint representation may create a conflict of interest and determine whether all such defendants agree to joint representation.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jordan, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Woods v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2002-11-26· cited 61×
- Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1986-02-25· cited 24×
- May v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1986-06-23· cited 19×
- Rautenberg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1986-02-24· cited 17×
- Christopher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-06-18· cited 16×
- Dill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2003-10-06· cited 11×
- Rice v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-06-11· cited 8×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-02-03· cited 7×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1986-02-18· cited 1×
- Luckett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1982-07-14
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1942-02-09· cited 10,035×
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,389×
- Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1972-05-22· cited 1,080×
- Fleming v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1980-06-09· cited 45×
- Rosser v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-11-14· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.