Supreme Court of Kansas· 2/28/1992

Dean v. State

Citations

826 P.2d 1372
250 Kan. 417
1992 Kan. LEXIS 63

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

interpretation of a statute is a necessary and inherent function of an agency in its administration or application of that statute
an agency’s interpretation of a statute was a necessary administrative act in implementing the statute, even though a court could later construe the statute differently
interpretation of a statute is a necessary and inherent function of an agency in its administration or application of that statute
no jurisdiction to consider petition for judicial review in a tax case where petitioners made no attempt to request an administrative hearing to resolve their claims and thus did not exhaust their administrative remedies
The interpretation of a statute by an agency was a necessaiy administrative act in implementing the statute, even though a court could later construe the statute at variance with the agency’s interpretation.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allegrucci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.