District of Columbia· 3/9/2017
De Sousa v. Central Intelligence Agency
Citations
- 239 F. Supp. 3d 179
- 2017 WL 943898
- 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33697
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[A]doption requires that an agency 'make an \express[]\ choice to use a deliberative document as a source of agency guidance.' \ (quoting Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. at 161, 95 S.Ct. 1504)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hunton & Williams LLP v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict of Columbia· 2017-03-31· cited 54×
- Heffernan v. AzarD.C. Circuit· 2018-06-27· cited 24×
- Yunes v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2017-06-26· cited 4×
- Murray v. McDonaldDistrict of Columbia· 2017-09-19· cited 3×
- Heffernan v. United States Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict of Columbia· 2018-06-27
- Gellman v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict of Columbia· 2021-02-22
- Selgjekaj v. Executive Office of the United States AttorneysDistrict of Columbia· 2021-08-06
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of StateDistrict of Columbia· 2021-08-17
Cites
59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court· 1975-04-28· cited 2,115×
- Department of the Air Force v. RoseSupreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 1,918×
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceD.C. Circuit· 1977-11-28· cited 1,376×
- Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyD.C. Circuit· 1980-02-15· cited 1,241×
- Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'nSupreme Court· 2001-03-05· cited 1,012×
- Morley v. Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2007-12-07· cited 720×
- Brayton v. Office of United States Trade RepresentativeD.C. Circuit· 2011-04-19· cited 711×
- Larson v. Department of StateD.C. Circuit· 2009-05-08· cited 703×
- Sussman v. United States Marshals ServiceD.C. Circuit· 2007-07-31· cited 655×
- Wolf v. Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2007-01-16· cited 615×
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationD.C. Circuit· 2006-06-02· cited 532×
- American Civil Liberties Union v. United States Department of DefenseD.C. Circuit· 2011-01-18· cited 521×
- Tax Analysts v. Internal Revenue ServiceD.C. Circuit· 1997-07-08· cited 483×
- United States Department of Justice v. LandanoSupreme Court· 1993-05-24· cited 470×
- Renegotiation Board v. Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp.Supreme Court· 1975-04-28· cited 437×
- Alan L. Fitzgibbon v. Central Intelligence Agency Alan L. Fitzgibbon v. Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 1990-08-14· cited 423×
- Federal Trade Commission v. Grolier Inc.Supreme Court· 1983-06-06· cited 387×
- United States Department of Justice v. JulianSupreme Court· 1988-05-16· cited 367×
- Trans-Pacific Policing Agreement v. United States Customs ServiceD.C. Circuit· 1999-06-01· cited 359×
- Harriet Ann Phillippi v. Central Intelligence Agency and George H. Bush, Director, Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 1976-11-24· cited 354×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.