De La Rosa v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• error in excluding witness’s written statement to police, which contradicted his trial testimony, was harmless under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 44.2(a) and (b) because the contradictory portions of the statement were read aloud to jury
• error in excluding witness's written statement to police, which contradicted his trial testimony, was harmless under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 44.2(a) and (b) because the contradictory portions of the statement were read aloud to jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Powell v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1999-11-04· cited 270×
• Davis v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-05-19· cited 71×
• Garza v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1998-02-25· cited 40×
• Samarron v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2004-09-01· cited 21×
• Vincent Davis v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-05-19
• Delgado, Elias v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2005-11-03
• Alberto Rocha v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2010-07-28
• Charles Bennett, Sr. v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2016-07-20

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Delaware v. Van Arsdall
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
• Lockhart v. Fretwell
  Supreme Court· 1993-01-25· cited 3,956×
• King v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-04-06· cited 447×
• Robertson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-03-09· cited 259×
• Shelby v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-11-13· cited 218×
• Crawford v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1996-08-29· cited 7×