Skip to main content
· 3/12/2015

Dawson Wise v. Zwicker & Associates PC

Citations

  • 780 F.3d 710
  • 2015 FED App. 0041P
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 3855
  • 2015 WL 1061965

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing dismissal of a claim where “[t]he pleadings do not provide sufficient facts to make a determination on the . . . [choice-of-law] issues”
  • applying contract choice-of-law analysis where issue was enforceability of provision in agreement
  • \[ Jerman ] makes clear that mistakes of state law can give rise to liability.\
  • “This transaction [an attempt to collect attorneys’ fees related to credit card debt collection] between a consumer and a financial institution falls outside Ohio’s statutory definition of a ‘consumer transaction.’”
  • “In each section, Congress provided a non-exhaustive list of examples of banned practices.”
  • choice of law provisions generally enforceable under Ohio law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Siler, Sutton, Stranch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.