Williams v. Javitch, Block & Rathbone, LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Court could not find any definitive authority that would exempt debt collectors as it exempts banks
• finding allegations that a debt collector’s law firm filed debt collection actions based on affidavits that it “knew or should have known” were not based on personal knowledge stated a claim under the FDCPA
• finding allegations that “the affidavit contained false or deceptive representations about the status and character of the debt in question” to not be “so fatally flawed that [plaintiff’s] claims under Sections 1692e and e(10) must be dismissed”
• knowledge that information in affidavit is false as to specifics of debt is more than lack of paper trail
• knowledge that information in affidavit is false as to specifics of debt violates FDCPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).