Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 10/31/2001

Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Citations

  • 93 Ohio St. 3d 488
  • 756 N.E.2d 657

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • res judicata is not to be so rigidly applied as to defeat the ends of justice or to create an injustice
  • “The binding effect of res judicata has been held not to apply when fairness and justice would not support it”
  • res judicata is not to be so rigidly applied as to defeat the ends of justice or to create an injustice
  • first-party claims must be brought in the same litigation if the party discovers the alleged spoliation during the pendency of that litigation
  • “[T]he doctrine of res judicata is to be applied in particular situations as fairness and justice require, [but] .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook, Douglas, From, Moyer, Pfeifer, Reasons, Resnick, She, Stratton, Sweeney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.