Davis v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of an opened door, the presence of a person in the house for the purpose of guarding against burglaries, and the defendant’s presence in the house was sufficient to sustain burglary conviction.
• holding that evidence of an opened door, the presence of a person in the house for the purpose of guarding against burglaries, and the defendant's presence in the house was sufficient to sustain burglary conviction.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Williams v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-11-10· cited 18×
• Payne v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-10-24· cited 9×
• Jack R. Wadsworth v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2001-07-17· cited 1×
• Lindani A. Mzembe v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-11-09
• Michael J. Johnson v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2019-08-28

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Case v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1984-01-17· cited 145×
• Barnard v. Collins
  Supreme Court· 1993-01-11· cited 89×
• McCovens v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1989-06-09· cited 37×
• Trice v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1986-04-01· cited 25×
• Baker v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1980-04-01· cited 21×
• Gardner v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1992-04-07· cited 13×