Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 132 A.3d 749
  • 2016 WL 358965
  • 2016 Del. LEXIS 41

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that Rule 35 is not the “proper procedural vehicle” for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim
  • indicating that claim that Superior Court erred by denying a request for sentencing transcripts did not implicate Rule 35(a)
  • “The proper procedural vehicle for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is Rule 61, not Rule 35.”
  • “The proper procedural vehicle for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is Rule 61, not Rule 35.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.