Supreme Court of Delaware· 1/28/2016
Davis v. State
Citations
- 132 A.3d 749
- 2016 WL 358965
- 2016 Del. LEXIS 41
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that Rule 35 is not the “proper procedural vehicle” for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim
- indicating that claim that Superior Court erred by denying a request for sentencing transcripts did not implicate Rule 35(a)
- “The proper procedural vehicle for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is Rule 61, not Rule 35.”
- “The proper procedural vehicle for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is Rule 61, not Rule 35.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2016-09-22
- West v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2016-09-23
- Mayo v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2018-04-11
- Nieves-Parrailla v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2020-05-27
- Palmer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2020-07-23
- Clifton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2021-12-07
- Powell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2022-03-28
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2023-01-27
- Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2023-04-06
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.