Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 43 Tex. 189

Syllabus

<p>1. Leading questions.—If leading questions appear to have been allowed over objections the reasons for such irregularity should be given by the judge in the bill of exceptions. It is error to allow leading questions, there being no reason for allowing them furnished in the record.</p> <p>2. Bade.—Penetration should be proved beyond a reasonable doubt, and the jury should be so instructed in prosecutions for rape.</p> <p>3. Apfidavit of juror will not he allowed to prove misconduct of the jury in the trial of a case.</p> <p>4. Penetration.—See facts held insufficient to prove penetration in a prosecution for rape. ,</p>

Judges: Devine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.