Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 214 So. 3d 799
  • 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5200

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant’s thirty-five- year aggregate sentence did not violate Graham or require resentencing under the new juvenile sentencing laws
  • concluding that a juvenile offender’s 35-year sentence for homicide and non-homicide offenses did not violate Graham or Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012), so resentencing was not required
  • concluding that the appellant’s aggregate thirty- five-year prison sentence did not violate Graham or Miller because he “was not sentenced to a life, mandatory life, or a de facto life sentence”
  • holding that defendant’s thirty-five-year aggregate sentence did not violate Graham
  • affirming the denial of a request for resentencing of a juvenile sentenced to 35 years for second degree murder
  • rejecting Graham challenge to 35-year sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelsey, Ray, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.