Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 968 So. 2d 1051
  • 2007 WL 4208267

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a plea agreement stating that defendant would receive 1531 days of credit was not “conclusive evidence” that defendant validly waived any additional' credit
  • concluding that written plea agreement that stated “[cjredit for time served as of 7/31/2006 is 1,531 days” was not conclusive evidence that defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived entitlement to any additional credit he was owed
  • holding that written statement in plea agreement that defendant would receive credit for 1531 days time served was not conclusive record evidence that defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to additional credit for time served
  • written plea agreement that called for 1,531 days of credit was not conclusive evidence that defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived entitlement to any additional credit he was owed
  • where written plea agreement stated that jail credit would be 1,531 days, that statement was not conclusive evidence that appellant knowingly and voluntarily waived jail credit to which he would be entitled

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torpy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.