Davis v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the current offense and one prior offense insufficient to establish a “pattern” of escalating criminal activity
• one prior \not included\ strong arm robbery does not establish pattern of criminal conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Barfield v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-08-01· cited 7×
• Frederick v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-01-31· cited 6×
• Darrisaw v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-09-09· cited 5×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-16· cited 2×
• Davis v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-09-28
• Gotay v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-07-12
• Richardson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-11-08

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Neil
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-09-27· cited 507×
• Keys v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-12-24· cited 108×
• State v. Rousseau
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1987-06-11· cited 108×
• Hansbrough v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1987-06-18· cited 81×
• Carter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-04-16· cited 14×
• Mitchell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-05-14· cited 13×
• Abt v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-07-13· cited 11×
• Ballard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-05-21· cited 9×