Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 436 So. 2d 196

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that evidence was insufficient where the sole proof of defendant's intent to participate in the robbery of a store was his earlier presence in the store with the perpetrators
  • defendant may not be convicted as an accessory after-the-fact where that crime was not charged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glickstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.