Davis v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• [a]ffirming denial of motion in part because the defendant’s allegations contradict each other
• “An appellant is not entitled to go behind sworn representations made to the court in a postconviction proceeding.”
• “An appellant is not entitled to go behind sworn representations made to the court in a postconviction proceeding.”
• “An appellant is not entitled to go behind sworn representations made to the court in a postconviction proceeding.”
• “An appellant is not entitled to go behind sworn representations made to the court.”
• “An appellant is not entitled to go behind sworn representations made to the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-10· cited 15×
• Rodriguez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-06-07· cited 10×
• Clift v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-07-30· cited 8×
• Norman J. Thompson v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-04-22· cited 3×
• Rivero v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-09-25· cited 1×
• Arline v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-03-12
• Allan Michael Hamilton v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-11-01
• ANTHONY LOPEZ v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-07-05
• Martesha Williams Johnson v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-12-11

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Stano v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-02-25· cited 76×