Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 831 S.W.2d 839
  • 1992 Tex. App. LEXIS 1860
  • 1992 WL 86326

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that error was preserved because a repeated objection would have been futile
  • holding that error was preserved because a repeated objection would have been futile

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Lagarde, Kaplan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.