Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 246 S.W.3d 862
  • 368 Ark. 401
  • 2007 Ark. LEXIS 21

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no abuse of trial court’s discretion in admission of 911 calls despite Rule 403 claims that they were cumulative to other evidence
  • where a particular argument was not raised below, it was not preserved for appellate review
  • where a particular argument was not raised below, it was not preserved for appellate review
  • expert-witness testimony that was contradictory concerning the defendant’s mental defect and a diagnosis of dissociative disorder was an issue for the jury to resolve
  • Issues must be presented to the circuit court in order to be preserved for appeal, and we will not address arguments that are raised for the first time on appeal.
  • Evidentiary issues must be presented to the circuit court in order to be preserved for appeal, and we will not address arguments that are raised for the first time on appeal.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Annabelle Clinton Imber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.