Davis v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• for purposes of child hearsay statute, “[ajnswers communicated through an interpreter [for the deaf child victim] are made to the person asking the question, despite the existence of an interpreter.”
• for purposes of child hearsay statute, “[a]nswers communicated through an interpreter [for the deaf child victim] are made to the person asking the question, despite the existence of an interpreter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Seidenfaden v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-03-05· cited 22×
• Carter v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-04-25· cited 15×
• Aaron v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-08-30· cited 13×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-10-04· cited 13×
• Cannon v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-10-16· cited 7×
• Orengo v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-10-27· cited 7×
• Evans v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-10-06· cited 6×
• Perry v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-03-15· cited 3×
• Michael Orengo v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-10-27

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Eubanks
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1977-09-07· cited 150×
• Ellis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-01-03· cited 24×
• Rank v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1986-04-22· cited 23×
• Willey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-06-28· cited 6×
• Tibbs v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-12-03· cited 5×