Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 486 S.E.2d 747
  • 326 S.C. 283
  • 1997 S.C. LEXIS 122

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding record did not support PCR judge’s conclusion that counsel’s deficient performance was prejudicial to respondent given respondent did not show how additional preparation would have resulted in a different outcome
  • declining to presume prejudice where trial counsel did not conduct an investigation of the charges against his client and admitted he was unprepared for trial
  • declining to presume prejudice where trial counsel did not conduct an investigation of the charges against his client and admitted he was unprepared for trial
  • evidence supported PCR judge’s ruling that counsel was deficient, in part because counsel admitted he was unprepared for trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burnett, Finney, Toal, Moore, Waller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.