Supreme Court of South Carolina· 6/23/1997
Davis v. State
Citations
- 486 S.E.2d 747
- 326 S.C. 283
- 1997 S.C. LEXIS 122
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding record did not support PCR judge’s conclusion that counsel’s deficient performance was prejudicial to respondent given respondent did not show how additional preparation would have resulted in a different outcome
- declining to presume prejudice where trial counsel did not conduct an investigation of the charges against his client and admitted he was unprepared for trial
- declining to presume prejudice where trial counsel did not conduct an investigation of the charges against his client and admitted he was unprepared for trial
- evidence supported PCR judge’s ruling that counsel was deficient, in part because counsel admitted he was unprepared for trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burnett, Finney, Toal, Moore, Waller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court· 1985-11-18· cited 11,299×
- Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-12-04· cited 215×
- Kibler v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-07-23· cited 17×
- Skeen v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-02-03· cited 15×
- Padgett v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-04-07· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.