Davis v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where reversal was mandated because the trial court erroneously refused to instruct the jury to limit its consideration to the one purpose for which the evidence was admissible
• no limiting instructions given upon request
• no limiting instructions given upon request

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Belt
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1998-09-21· cited 86×
• Moore v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-01-13· cited 27×
• Peterson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-02-22· cited 13×
• McCann v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-04-09· cited 13×
• Thomas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-08-17· cited 5×
• Gregory v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-03-31· cited 1×
• Reed v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-05-06· cited 1×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-10-12

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Saltarelli
  Washington Supreme Court· 1982-12-16· cited 227×
• Walker v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1978-05-09· cited 108×
• Daggett v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
  California Supreme Court· 1957-06-21· cited 81×
• Harrell v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1978-04-05· cited 71×
• Cooper v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1936-02-18· cited 54×
• Mangrum v. Union Pacific Railroad
  California Court of Appeal· 1964-12-01· cited 10×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-02-20· cited 3×