Davis v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a trial court's order rescheduling a hearing beyond the sixty-day window prescribed in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(1)(B) implicitly extended the time allowed for the trial court to hear and rule on the defendant's motion to correct sentencing error
• \[R]ule 3.050 authorizes the trial court to extend the sixty-day time period of rule 3.800(b) if the trial court acts within the sixty-day period to extend the time period and there is a showing of good cause.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Parker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-08-03· cited 9×
• Miran v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-10-29· cited 7×
• Florida West Realty v. Mdg Lake Trafford
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-07-11· cited 3×
• Peterson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-02-02· cited 2×
• Broughton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-31· cited 2×
• STATE OF FLORIDA v. TASHANE M. CHANTILOUPE
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-06-06· cited 1×
• State v. Cousins
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-05-13
• Mattice v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-09-06

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Boyd
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-04-17· cited 35×
• In Re Goldman's Estate
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1955-04-27· cited 35×
• Abreu v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-09-21· cited 23×
• Kimbrough v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-09-29· cited 21×
• Dohnal v. Syndicated Offices Systems
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-06-02· cited 20×
• McGuire v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-07· cited 12×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-18· cited 1×