Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 741 So. 2d 1213
  • 1999 WL 765857

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that fundamental error occurs when the trial court orders a defendant to pay restitution for a loss not bearing a significant relationship to the crime charged
  • holding that restitution was improper where theft of jewelry was not related to offense of attempted burglary and where there was no indication that State presented evidence that theft of the jewelry was part of the defendant's criminal episode
  • holding that restitution was improper where theft of jewelry was not related to offense of attempted burglary and where there was no indication that State presented evidence that theft of the jewelry was part of the defendant’s criminal episode
  • reversing restitution for stolen items when defendant pleaded to attempted burglary, not theft, and there was no significant relationship between offense and victim’s loss
  • reversing restitution for stolen items when defendant pleaded to attempted burglary, not theft, and there was no significant relationship between offense and victim's loss
  • reversing restitution for stolen items when defendant pleaded to attempted burglary, not theft, and there was no significant relationship between offense and victim’s loss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.