Skip to main content
· 2/27/2012

Davis v. Petito

Citations

  • 39 A.3d 96
  • 425 Md. 191
  • 2012 WL 603547
  • 2012 Md. LEXIS 82

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a party “was not obligated to make a proffer once the court had finally ruled on her motion in limine ”
  • concluding that, in determining an award of attorney's fees under Section 12-103(b
  • concluding that, in determining an award of attorney's fees under Section 12-103(b), the trial court must first consider whether the parties had substantial justification for bringing or defending their respective positions prior to evaluating the value of the legal services provided
  • “[S]ubstantial justification is but one consideration in the triad, the others being financial status and needs, to support fee shifting.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Harrell, Battaglia, Greene, Adkins, Barbera, Eldridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.