Court of Appeals of Maryland· 4/13/2010
Henriquez v. Henriquez
Citations
- 992 A.2d 446
- 413 Md. 287
- 2010 Md. LEXIS 138
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- construing Family Law Article § 12-103 to be in harmony with sections 7-107, 8-214, and 11-110 to avoid an “illogical result”
- observing that “court may neither add nor delete language so as to reflect an intent not evidenced in the plain and unambiguous language of the statute; nor may it construe the statute with forced or subtle interpretations that limit or extend its application”
- awarding fees under statute similar to A.R.S. § 25-324 and collecting cases
- upholding the Circuit Court’s award of attorneys’ fees to Mrs. Henriquez because the court “engaged in balancing under Section 12-103, finding that Mrs. Henriquez was ‘wholly dependent’ and ‘virtually penniless,’ warranting an award of attorneys’ fees, given Mr. Henriquez’s financial ability”
- “[w]e will not . . . judicially insert language [into a statute] to impose exceptions, limitations, or restrictions not set forth by the legislature”
- “[w]e will not . . . judicially insert language [into a statute] to impose exceptions, limitations, or restrictions not set forth by the legislature”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Battaglia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Campusano v. Lusitano Construction LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-11-21· cited 46×
- Weichert Co. v. FaustCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-04-27· cited 44×
- Schreyer v. ChaplainCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-10-06· cited 39×
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-12-22· cited 24×
- 100 Harborview Drive Condominium Council of Unit Owners v. ClarkCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-07-30· cited 15×
- ANTINI v. ANTINISupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2019-04-09· cited 12×
- Worsham v. GreenfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-10-23· cited 12×
- Carter v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-04-02· cited 10×
- Thompson v. CorryCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-11-15· cited 10×
- Davis v. PetitoCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-02-27· cited 9×
- State v. BravermanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-06-01· cited 9×
- Wanttaja v. WanttajaNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2016-01-14· cited 8×
- Meade v. Shangri-La PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-01-26· cited 5×
- Martin v. Allegany County Board of EducationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-06-28· cited 4×
- In re RosenbergCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-05-01· cited 1×
- Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. v. Maryland Department of AgricultureCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-05-02· cited 1×
- Feld v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanyDistrict of Columbia· 2020-03-09
- Bolling v. Bay Country Consumer FinanceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-07-01
- State v. MaillouxCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2024-03-27
- State v. MaillouxCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2024-04-02
Other cases named Henriquez v. Henriquez
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.