Davis v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that when reviewing a child custody order, this Court is mindful that the family court observed the witnesses and was in a better position to judge their credibility and assign comparative weight to the testimony
• finding in a child custody case, the welfare of the child and the child's best interests are the primary, paramount, and controlling considerations of the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Clark v. Clark
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-05-02· cited 22×
• McComb v. Conard
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-08-24· cited 19×
• Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-07-26· cited 18×
• Divine v. Robbins
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-07-28· cited 16×
• Buist v. Buist
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-06-06· cited 10×
• SCDSS/Child Support Enforcement v. Carswell
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-06-01· cited 4×
• Nathenia J. Rossington v. Julio A. Rossington
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2022-11-23

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cherry v. Thomasson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-07-09· cited 113×
• Cook v. Cobb
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-06-22· cited 72×
• McAlister v. Patterson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-12-21· cited 40×
• South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Vanderhorst
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-02-07· cited 28×
• Rice v. Rice
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-04-26· cited 15×
• Dixon v. Dixon
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-06-21· cited 14×
• Eckstein v. Eckstein
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-10-07· cited 6×