Skip to main content

Davis v. Campbell

Citations

  • 965 P.2d 1017
  • 327 Or. 584
  • 1998 Ore. LEXIS 897

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the common-law standard for negligence “says nothing about whether the legislature intended that legal standard to apply to a statutory claim under the RLTA”
  • holding that the common-law standard for negligence “says nothing about whether the legislature intended that legal standard to apply to a statutory claim under the RLTA”
  • holding that the common-law standard for negligence “says nothing about whether the legislature intended that legal standard to apply to a statutory claim under the RLTA”
  • holding that the common-law standard for negligence “says nothing about whether the legislature intended that legal standard to apply to a statutory claim under the RLTA”
  • recognizing statutory liability pursuant to former ORS 30.950

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Durham, Kulongoski, Vanhoomissen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.