Davidson v. Dallas
Citations
- 15 Cal. 75
Syllabus
<p>A decision of the Supreme Court in a given case, whether erroneous or not, becomes the law of the case, and cannot be reviewed when the case comes up on a second appeal, the facts being the same.</p> <p>In theory, issue is joined, in the Supreme Court, upon the assignment of errors made upon the record. The case may be regarded as a new and distinct action. Upon the issue thus made the judgment of the Court must rest, and that judgment affirms the law on the matter presented for adjudication, and fixes the rights of the parties under the law.</p> <p>And where the judgment below is reversed and the cause remanded for new trial, it must be retried in pursuance of the principles of law declared in the opinion „ of the Appellate Court. The directions of the opinion become a portion of the judgment.</p> <p>The Supreme Court loses jurisdiction over a case, after the remittitur is issued, and the Term at which the judgment was rendered has passed. And this, whether the judgment be final in the sense of a definitive determination of the matters involved, or interlocutory.</p>
Judges: Baldwin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Boyce v. California Stage Co.California Supreme Court· 1864-07-01· cited 59×
- City of Hastings v. FoxworthyNebraska Supreme Court· 1895-06-22· cited 51×
- Haynes v. MeeksCalifornia Supreme Court· 1862-07-01· cited 42×
- People v. AzoffCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-01-17· cited 37×
- Wilkes v. DaviesWashington Supreme Court· 1894-01-22· cited 30×
- Plymouth County Bank v. GilmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1892-06-18· cited 26×
- Haley v. KilpatrickEighth Circuit· 1900-10-24· cited 25×
- Phelan v. City & County of San FrancisoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1862-07-01· cited 22×
- Reclamation District No. 3 v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1884-09-30· cited 18×
- Portland Trust Co. v. CoulterOregon Supreme Court· 1892-10-31· cited 17×
- Griffiths v. MontandonIdaho Supreme Court· 1895-02-27· cited 16×
- Palmer v. Utah & Northern Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court· 1888-02-08· cited 13×
- Lewis v. JohnsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1868-07-01· cited 13×
- People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-08-02· cited 13×
- Lucas v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1865-10-15· cited 9×
- Davenport v. KleinschmidtMontana Supreme Court· 1889-01-15· cited 9×
- Silva v. PickardUtah Supreme Court· 1896-10-27· cited 8×
- Lee v. MaxwellMichigan Supreme Court· 1894-01-26· cited 4×
- Fury v. WhiteIdaho Supreme Court· 1890-02-24· cited 1×
- Haggin v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court· 1886-12-27· cited 1×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Skillern's Executors v. May's ExecutorsSupreme Court· 1810-03-18· cited 80×
- Clary v. HoaglandCalifornia Supreme Court· 1856-07-01· cited 40×
- Davidson v. DallasCalifornia Supreme Court· 1857-07-01· cited 35×
- Hosack's Executors v. RogersNew York Supreme Court· 1840-12-15· cited 13×
- Clary v. HoaglandCalifornia Supreme Court· 1855-07-01· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.