· 5/3/1973
DAVENPORT v. Apportionment Comm.
Citations
- 304 A.2d 736
- 124 N.J. Super. 30
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \`citizens of each county have a community of interest by virtue of their common responsibility to provide for public needs'\
- plan remanded to commission to show whether, and to what extent, state constitutional criteria were considered, and to devise alternative plan, if possible
- “‘citizens of each county have a community of interest by virtue of their common responsibility to provide for public needs’”
- plan remanded to commission to show whether, and to what extent, state constitutional criteria were considered, and to devise alternative plan, if possible
- “The citizens of each county have a community of interest by virtue of their common responsibility to provide for public needs and their investment in the plants and facilities established to that end”
- \The citizens of each county have a community of interest by virtue of their common responsibility to provide for public needs and their investment in the plants and facilities established to that end\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Carton, Mintz and Seidman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.