Skip to main content
· 5/3/1973

DAVENPORT v. Apportionment Comm.

Citations

  • 304 A.2d 736
  • 124 N.J. Super. 30

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \`citizens of each county have a community of interest by virtue of their common responsibility to provide for public needs'\
  • plan remanded to commission to show whether, and to what extent, state constitutional criteria were considered, and to devise alternative plan, if possible
  • “‘citizens of each county have a community of interest by virtue of their common responsibility to provide for public needs’”
  • plan remanded to commission to show whether, and to what extent, state constitutional criteria were considered, and to devise alternative plan, if possible
  • “The citizens of each county have a community of interest by virtue of their common responsibility to provide for public needs and their investment in the plants and facilities established to that end”
  • \The citizens of each county have a community of interest by virtue of their common responsibility to provide for public needs and their investment in the plants and facilities established to that end\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Carton, Mintz and Seidman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.