Datascope Corp. v. Smec, Inc., and Peter Schiff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiff’s delay in seeking to amend its complaint was undue because plaintiff “was, or should have been, aware” of the factual basis for its claim “long before” it sought to amend
• “The grant or denial of leave to amend the complaint is within the discretion of the district court, and will be reversed only for an abuse of discretion.” (internal citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).