Skip to main content
· 4/24/1991

Peter Gabor Kalman v. The Berlyn Corporation, Defendant/cross-Appellant

Citations

  • 914 F.2d 1473

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district court erred by deducting taxes that would have been paid from lost profits award
  • stating that law of regional circuit court governs standard for motion to amend
  • finding nexus between paten-tee and his 50%-owned sole manufacturing licensee to be “so clearly defined” as to permit licensee co-plaintiff standing
  • finding nexus between patentee and his 50%-owned sole manufacturing licensee to be \so clearly defined\ as to permit licensee co-plaintiff standing
  • affirming award of damages based upon profits lost on sales of unpatented filter screens that were usually sold along with the device disclosed in the patent in suit
  • filler screens designed for use with patented device, guarantee of patented product required purchase of patented device, and filler screens usually sold with patented device

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: , Rich, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.