Skip to main content
· 7/12/2016

Dannice E. Clark v. United States Postal Service

Citations

  • 2016 MSPB 26

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a similar argument by the State dealing with a parolee “is essentially a post hoc justification for the conduct of the police, based on information the police did not know at the time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.