Skip to main content

Danks v. State

Citations

  • 619 P.2d 720
  • 1980 Alas. LEXIS 735

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting defendant’s argument that three-year revocation of license required by amended law would constitute an ex post facto law as applied to him because his first two offenses occurred prior to the statutory enactment
  • “An ex post facto law is a law ‘passed after the occurrence of a fact or commission of an act, which retrospectively changes the legal consequences or relations of such fact or deed.’” (quoting “Ex Post Facto Law,” Black’s Law Dictionary (5th ed. 1979))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Connor, Burke, Matthews, Dimond, Boochever

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.