Danielson v. National Supply Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that in tort cases arising out of insurance disputes, “predictability of result may be important.”
• concluding that simplification of the judicial task was a neutral factor that “d[id] not favor any of the forums” because the competing statutes of limitations were “quite clear and easy to apply.”
• concluding that simplification of the judicial task was a neutral factor that “d[id] not favor any of the forums” because the competing statutes of limitations were “quite clear and easy to apply.”
• noting that “[t]here is some ambiguity” as to whether Minnesota courts always apply Minnesota statutes of limitations, even though they generally view them as procedural
• stating that the law of the forum governs procedural issues
• stating that the law of the forum governs procedural issues

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).