Skip to main content

Daniels v. State

Citations

  • 688 P.2d 315
  • 100 Nev. 579
  • 1984 Nev. LEXIS 430

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a post-conviction proceeding is separate from the direct appeal
  • recognizing that a post-conviction proceeding is separate from the direct appeal
  • recognizing that a post-conviction proceeding is separate from the direct appeal
  • recognizing that a postconviction proceeding is separate from the direct appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.