California Court of Appeal· 7/26/1956
Daniels v. Daniels
Citations
- 143 Cal. App. 2d 430
- 300 P.2d 335
- 1956 Cal. App. LEXIS 1618
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding any ruling upon the issue of paternity made in a divorce action would not bind the child nor affect the child’s right to compel support from a husband if he is the child’s father
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ashburn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ruddock v. OhlsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-03-29· cited 67×
- Treber v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-01-23· cited 66×
- A----. B v. C----. DIndiana Court of Appeals· 1971-12-29· cited 50×
- Matter of Paternity of SDMWyoming Supreme Court· 1994-10-10· cited 28×
- Kelly v. SteinbergCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1957-02-01· cited 22×
- Everett v. EverettCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1976-04-05· cited 22×
- L_____ v. R____Missouri Court of Appeals· 1974-12-30· cited 21×
- Adoption of StroopeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1965-03-02· cited 21×
- Adamson v. AdamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1962-11-13· cited 19×
- Arvin-Kern Co. v. B. J. Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1960-03-10· cited 17×
- Tibbets v. RobbCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1958-03-12· cited 14×
- State Ex Rel. Evertson v. CornettSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1964-04-07· cited 13×
- Buzzell v. BuzzellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1967-12-01· cited 11×
- O_F_L v. M_R_RMissouri Court of Appeals· 1974-12-30· cited 8×
- In Re Estate of CunhaHawaii Supreme Court· 1966-05-31· cited 7×
- County of Santa Clara v. DollCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1959-04-07· cited 2×
- Devereaux v. DevereauxSupreme Court of Colorado· 1960-08-22· cited 2×
- In re the Estate of TudelaNorthern Mariana Islands Commonwealth Trial Court· 1988-07-13
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1948-10-01· cited 179×
- Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1951-01-26· cited 137×
- Leupe v. LeupeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1942-11-02· cited 108×
- Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1946-05-27· cited 108×
- Rediker v. RedikerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1950-08-18· cited 87×
- Logan v. ForsterCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1952-12-05· cited 58×
- Gonzales v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1950-02-21· cited 52×
- Dietrich v. DietrichCalifornia Supreme Court· 1953-09-25· cited 46×
- George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal· 1948-02-05· cited 38×
- Estate of HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1947-06-24· cited 37×
- Borg v. BorgCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1938-02-09· cited 35×
- Tennison v. DoniganTexas Commission of Appeals· 1922-02-01· cited 21×
- Royal v. RoyalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1949-09-23· cited 21×
- Martinez v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court· 1953-12-01· cited 18×
- Wong v. Wong Hing YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1947-06-18· cited 16×
- BOARD OF COM'RS FOR BURAS LEVEE DIST. v. CockrellFifth Circuit· 1937-07-03· cited 13×
- Kaye v. TellsenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1954-11-22· cited 9×
- Davis' Administrator v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1916-11-02· cited 8×
- Daniels v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1955-05-03· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.