Daniel v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial judge's statements that defendant was trying to introduce illegal evidence and that defendant had everything to gain and nothing to lose by introducing such evidence were prejudicial, requiring reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• White v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1989-03-31· cited 130×
• Gwin v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-03-23· cited 95×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-08-18· cited 8×
• Phillips v. City of Dothan
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1988-09-20· cited 6×
• Walker v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-12-29· cited 4×
• Woods v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2016-06-03· cited 2×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Daniel v. State
  Alabama Court of Appeals· 1961-05-30· cited 9×