Skip to main content

Daniel v. State

Citations

  • 41 Ala. App. 405
  • 134 So. 2d 752
  • 1961 Ala. App. LEXIS 363

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial judge's statements that defendant was trying to introduce illegal evidence and that defendant had everything to gain and nothing to lose by introducing such evidence were prejudicial, requiring reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.