Daniel Hanson v. David Beth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• af- firming denial of relief on Chambers claim based on exclusion of evidence
• “[T]he Supreme Court has said that a state court does not need to cite, or even be aware of, its precedents ‘so long as neither the reasoning nor the result of the state-court decision contradicts them.’”
• “[T]he Supreme Court has said that a state court does not need to cite, or even be aware of, its precedents ‘so long as neither the reasoning nor the result of the state-court decision contradicts them.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).