Arredondo v. Huibregtse

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a colloquy regarding defendant's waiver of the right to testify is not required, but is within the court’s discretion
• distinguishing Ortega because it “arose prior to Congress’ enactment of [AEDPA] and, therefore, the court in Ortega was at liberty to apply a much more searching standard of review than the one to which AEDPA confines us.”
• distinguishing Ortega because it “arose prior to Congress’ enactment of [AEDPA] and, therefore, the court in Ortega was at liberty to apply a much more searching standard of review than the one to which AEDPA confines us.”
• distinguishing Ortega because it “arose prior to Congress’ enactment of [AEDPA] and, therefore, the court in Ortega was at liberty to apply a much more searching standard of review than the one to which AEDPA confines us.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).