Sixth Circuit· 8/2/2013

Daniel Greenberg v. Procter & Gamble Company

Citations

724 F.3d 713
86 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 216
2013 WL 3957060
2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 15930

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that “[t]he relief that this settlement provides to unnamed class members is illusory” and therefore finding the settlement unfair
stating that “[t]he relief that this settlement provides to unnamed class members is illusory” and therefore finding the settlement unfair
rejecting $2.73 million attorney fee award where the class itself received no cash whatsoever
rejecting $2.73 million attorney fee award where the class itself received no cash whatsoever
finding named plaintiffs inadequate where they had incentives to compromise the interest of the class for personal gain
finding named plaintiffs inadequate where they had incentives to compromise the interest of the class for personal gain

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole, Kethledge, Thapar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.