Skip to main content
· 9/22/2009

Moulton v. United States Steel Corp.

Citations

  • 581 F.3d 344
  • 74 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 918
  • 39 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20218
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20896
  • 2009 WL 2997921

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding explanation inadequate when district said only that “attorney fee percentage is fair and reasonable considering the several years of litigation” (alterations and quotation marks omitted)
  • determining the reasonableness of an attorney’s fee award based on “(1) the value of the benefit rendered to the plaintiff class; (2) the value of the services on an hourly basis; (3) whether the services were undertaken on a contingent fee basis; (4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clay, Sutton, Thapar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.