Fifth Circuit· 1/3/1989
Danforth Manning v. The Upjohn Company
Citations
- 862 F.2d 545
- 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 29
- 1989 WL 1
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Principles of judicial restraint dictate that if resolution of an issue effectively disposes of a case, we should resolve the case on that basis without reaching any other issues that might be presented.”
- “Principles of judicial restraint dictate that if resolution of an issue effectively disposes of a case, we should resolve the case on that basis without reaching any other issues that might be presented.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Politz, Johnson, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hayden v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceWashington Supreme Court· 2000-06-15· cited 164×
- Hayden v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court· 2000-06-15· cited 145×
- State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court· 1997-12-18· cited 132×
- Jeff Armstrong v. Turner Industries, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1998-06-08· cited 118×
- Poppen v. WalkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-06-22· cited 89×
- Arnold B. Griffin v. Steven Davies and Attorney General of the State of KansasTenth Circuit· 1991-03-29· cited 80×
- City of Shoreacres v. WaterworthFifth Circuit· 2005-08-25· cited 41×
- Vergie Swearingen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas CorporationFifth Circuit· 1992-08-19· cited 41×
- Christiano v. Spokane County Health DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-11-17· cited 19×
- Bowser v. McDonald's Corp.S.D. Texas· 1989-02-02· cited 19×
- Unnamed caseFifth Circuit· 1996-04-04· cited 18×
- Chacko v. Texas a & M UniversityS.D. Texas· 1997-04-04· cited 16×
- PRESCOTT v. OKLAHOMA CAPITOL PRESERVATION COMMISSIONSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2015-07-27· cited 16×
- Hopwood v. TexasFifth Circuit· 1996-04-04· cited 12×
- Fidelity Deposit & Discount Bank v. Domiano (In Re Domiano)M.D. Pennsylvania· 2010-12-28· cited 10×
- Taylor v. Houston Lighting and Power Co.S.D. Texas· 1990-11-27· cited 9×
- Jay Y. Crum v. American Airlines, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1991-12-12· cited 8×
- TCAP CORP. v. GervinWashington Supreme Court· 2008-06-05· cited 8×
- HM Electronics, Inc. v. R.F. Technologies, Inc.S.D. California· 2016-03-15· cited 8×
- Ken Paxton, Atty Gen v. DettelbachFifth Circuit· 2024-06-21· cited 7×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 11,658×
- Sabine Pilot Service, Inc. v. HauckTexas Supreme Court· 1985-04-03· cited 447×
- East Line & Red River Railroad v. ScottTexas Supreme Court· 1888-11-20· cited 307×
- Reynolds Manufacturing Co. v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1982-11-29· cited 100×
- Benoit v. Polysar Gulf Coast, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1987-03-12· cited 63×
- Lumpkin v. H & C COMMUNICATIONS, INC.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1988-07-28· cited 58×
- Linda Aiello v. United Air Lines, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1987-06-11· cited 55×
- Stiver v. Texas Instruments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1988-04-07· cited 40×
- Salazar v. Amigos Del Valle, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1988-06-30· cited 37×
- Advance Ross Electronics Corp. v. Green, 1981)Court of Appeals of Texas· 1981-10-29· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.