Skip to main content
· 5/5/2004

City of Shoreacres v. Waterworth

Citations

  • 332 F. Supp. 2d 992
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13354
  • 2004 WL 1877609

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting a cross motion for summary judgment filed by an intervenor defendant who had never been named in the Plaintiff’s pleadings
  • “The jurisdictional determination under the CWA is a highly technical decision within the expertise of the Corps and it is entitled to substantial deference.”
  • agency was not required to consider hypothetical deepening of a ship channel among the proposed project’s cumulative impacts, because the project was not predicted to cause enough of the channel’s forecasted growth to create the necessity for deepening it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gilmore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.