Dane v. Daniel
Citations
- 23 Wash. 379
- 63 P. 268
- 1900 Wash. LEXIS 369
Syllabus
<p>MORTGAGES-FORECLOSURE.</p> <p>Under the laws of this state, a mortgage upon realty creates merely a lien thereon and does not pass title thereto,</p> <p>either before or after condition broken; and hence a suit in strict foreclosure, where the mortgagee is proceeding against the owner of the fee, whether such owner be the mortgagor or a subsequent purchaser from him, is unauthorized either by the statute, or by the nature of a mortgage under the statute.</p> <p>SAME-COMMUNITY PROPERTY — PARTIES.</p> <p>In an action to foreclose a mortgage upon community real property, both husband and wife are necessary party defendants, although the record title to the premises may be in the name of but one of the spouses.</p> <p>ESTOPPEL-COMMUNITY PROPERTY IN NAME OF ONE SPOUSE-FAILURE OF OTHER TO FILE CLAIM.</p> <p>The failure of one spouse to file in the office of the county auditor an instrument setting up his or her claim in community property held in the name of the other spouse, as provided by Bal. Code, § 4545, does not estop such spouse from claiming an interest therein, except as against such bona fide purchasers as purchase without knowledge of the existence of the marriage relation, or who could not, by the exercise of reasonable diligence, have obtained such knowledge.</p>
Judges: Fullerton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- King v. UhlmannArizona Supreme Court· 1968-02-07· cited 40×
- Daly v. RizzuttoWashington Supreme Court· 1910-06-16· cited 39×
- State ex rel. Peel v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court· 1917-01-02· cited 36×
- Morrill v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1917-01-13· cited 33×
- Dane v. DanielWashington Supreme Court· 1902-03-29· cited 31×
- London & San Francisco Bank, Ltd. v. Dexter Horton & Co.Ninth Circuit· 1903-10-19· cited 24×
- Fischer v. WoodruffWashington Supreme Court· 1901-04-25· cited 15×
- Beverly v. DavisWashington Supreme Court· 1914-05-08· cited 14×
- Payson v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court· 1905-04-10· cited 13×
- Jump v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court· 1906-12-07· cited 12×
- State ex rel. Bryant v. StarwichWashington Supreme Court· 1924-10-06· cited 11×
- Thomas v. Provident Life & Trust Co.Ninth Circuit· 1905-05-22· cited 10×
- Gerber v. HeathWashington Supreme Court· 1916-08-16· cited 8×
- Thornely v. AndrewsWashington Supreme Court· 1905-11-27· cited 6×
- McClintic-Marshall Co. v. Scandinavian-American Bldg. Co.Ninth Circuit· 1924-03-03· cited 4×
- Wright v. JessupWashington Supreme Court· 1906-12-08· cited 3×
- Chute v. Attalia Land Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1916-04-21· cited 3×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Parke v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1894-01-16· cited 18×
- Lownsdale v. Gray's Harbor Boom Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1899-10-13· cited 14×
- Hays v. Merchants' National Bank of Port TownsendWashington Supreme Court· 1896-03-05· cited 13×
- Nuhn v. MillerWashington Supreme Court· 1892-12-17· cited 10×
- Adams v. BlackWashington Supreme Court· 1893-06-20· cited 10×
- Curry v. CatlinWashington Supreme Court· 1894-08-07· cited 10×
- Leggett v. RossWashington Supreme Court· 1896-02-20· cited 4×
- City of Seattle v. BaxterWashington Supreme Court· 1898-12-16· cited 2×
- Minford v. Old Dominion Steam-Ship Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York· 1891-11-07· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.