Dalton v. Dalton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• appellant fails to develop any argument; we will not conjecture any theory absent appellant’s consideration of this issue
• custody of children 6 out of 14 days not unusual
• 43 percent time did not justify deviation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-10-25· cited 494×
• Colonna v. Colonna
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-12-21· cited 14×
• Connor v. Connor
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-06-13· cited 7×
• Anzalone v. Anzalone
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-03-25· cited 4×
• Thompson v. Monetary Management Corp.
  Delaware County Court of Common Pleas· 2000-03-15· cited 1×
• Minnich v. Minnich
  Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas· 1992-12-08
• Robbins v. Robbins
  Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 1997-03-18
• Kurtz v. Stamm
  Berks County Court of Common Pleas· 2001-04-06
• Narin v. Pierce Leahy Corp.
  Delaware County Court of Common Pleas· 1996-06-13
• Sgro v. Canale
  Delaware County Court of Common Pleas· 1996-08-02
• Grant v. Baggott
  Delaware County Court of Common Pleas· 1997-09-30
• Fultz v. Fine
  Delaware County Court of Common Pleas· 1998-10-28
• Newman v. Lombardo
  Delaware County Court of Common Pleas· 2000-03-03
• Cassidy v. Crozer Chester Medical Center
  Delaware County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-11-10

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Griffin v. Griffin
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-29· cited 49×
• Giant Markets, Inc. v. Sigma Marketing Systems, Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-04-15· cited 39×