Connor v. Connor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding as a matter of law that mother’s spending 27% of the time with the children is not unusual and does not warrant a reduction in her support payments to father
• trial court’s meager explanation did not justify twenty-seven percent reduction of defendant’s obligation
• 27 percent and 73 percent custody sharing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Colonna v. Colonna
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-12-21· cited 14×
• Calabrese v. Calabrese
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-02-02· cited 8×
• Elias v. Spencer
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-03-29· cited 8×
• Diehl on Behalf of Beaver v. Beaver
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-08-10· cited 7×
• Anzalone v. Anzalone
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-03-25· cited 4×
• Robbins v. Robbins
  Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 1997-03-18

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Griffin v. Griffin
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-29· cited 49×
• Dalton v. Dalton
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-10-07· cited 15×
• Young v. Muthersbaugh
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-30· cited 11×